Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$SEBLX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,682 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- sevsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- spegx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Alger Responsible Investing Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- stsbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Seix Short-Term Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- swfcx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Touchstone International Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- tpiax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Timothy Plan International Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- tgnix
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
TCW Funds, Inc. - TCW International Small Cap Fund
Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- tvvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Guggenheim RBP® Large-Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- vmttx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Viking Tax-Free Fund For Montana Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wblnx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Short
William Blair Low Duration Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
- wbvdx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
William Blair Small Cap Value Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- wtifx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Segall Bryant & Hamill Fundamental Int'l Small Cap Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- wtmcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Segall Bryant & Hamill Mid Cap Value Dividend Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- aadr
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- dalvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Dunham Large Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- lmyix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global High Yield Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dhycx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
BNY Mellon High Yield Municipal Bond Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lotcx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Future
LoCorr Market Trend Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »
- gabtx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Communication Services
Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class AAA
Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »