SCZ : iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF

SCZ is a International Stocks Market Mid-Cap Blend with MODERATE fees.

SCZ

iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF

FI Score

79 /100

Diversification Rating

9 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,823 International Stocks Mid-Cap Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SCZ vs ETW

47% FI Score
  • etw
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Options-based

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Options-based Other fund. See why »

Compare SCZ vs LIT

47% FI Score
  • lit
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SCZ vs SYG

47% FI Score
  • syg
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

SPDR MFS Systematic Growth Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCZ vs MCA

47% FI Score
  • mca
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BlackRock MuniYield California Quality Fund, Inc.

Expenses: 2.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCZ vs BPRSX

47% FI Score
  • bprsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

BlackRock Inflation Protected Bond Fund Service Shares

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCZ vs GHYB

47% FI Score
  • ghyb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCZ vs AMZA

47% FI Score
  • amza
  • ETF
  • Other
  • Master Limited Partnership

InfraCap MLP ETF

Expenses: 2.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Master Limited Partnership Other fund. See why »

Compare SCZ vs FESGX

47% FI Score
  • fesgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

First Eagle Global Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCZ vs ALGRX

47% FI Score
  • algrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Alger Focus Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCZ vs URA

47% FI Score
  • ura
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Global X Uranium ETF

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SCZ vs JCUIX

47% FI Score
  • jcuix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Money Market
  • World

John Hancock Funds Absolute Return Currency Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »

Compare SCZ vs SGG

47% FI Score
  • sgg
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Sugar Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare SCZ vs TUNIX

47% FI Score
  • tunix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Transamerica Unconstrained Bond Class I

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCZ vs EOD

47% FI Score
  • eod
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Wells Fargo Global Dividend Opportunity Fund

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCZ vs UTBPX

47% FI Score
  • utbpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

UBS Total Return Bond Fund Class P

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCZ vs OHYAX

47% FI Score
  • ohyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCZ vs LSFYX

47% FI Score
  • lsfyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCZ vs MLDAX

47% FI Score
  • mldax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Short Duration Income Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCZ vs MXI

47% FI Score
  • mxi
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

iShares Global Materials ETF

Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SCZ vs IHY

47% FI Score
  • ihy
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo