SCIX : Global X Scientific Beta Asia ex-Japan ETF

SCIX is a International Stocks Market Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock with LOW fees.

SCIX

Global X Scientific Beta Asia ex-Japan ETF

FI Score

44 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SCIX vs MERKX

14% FI Score
  • merkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Merk Hard Currency Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs EIM

14% FI Score
  • eim
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund

Expenses: 2.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs KOIN

14% FI Score
  • koin
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Innovation Shares NextGen Protocol ETF

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs LCTIX

14% FI Score
  • lctix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Leader Capital Leader Total Return Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs LCATX

14% FI Score
  • lcatx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Leader Capital Leader Total Return Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 2.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs MEAPX

14% FI Score
  • meapx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Fixed Income Opportunities Portfolio A

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs MISEX

14% FI Score
  • misex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Midas Magic

Expenses: 3.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs ACHPX

14% FI Score
  • achpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Beacon Crescent Short Duration High Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs NUGCX

14% FI Score
  • nugcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nuveen Santa Barbara Global Dividend Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs AEQIX

14% FI Score
  • aeqix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Ascendant Deep Value Bond Fund Class I Shares

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs PFHCX

14% FI Score
  • pfhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Pacific Funds Small-Cap Value Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs AHSCX

14% FI Score
  • ahscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Alger Health Sciences Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs AMJCX

14% FI Score
  • amjcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

American Century Multi-Asset Income Fund C Class

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs NEHCX

14% FI Score
  • nehcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Loomis Sayles High Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs NERCX

14% FI Score
  • nercx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs NGQCX

14% FI Score
  • ngqcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Neuberger Berman Integrated Large Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs ARLSX

14% FI Score
  • arlsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AMG River Road Long-Short Fund Class N

Expenses: 2.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs NSHCX

14% FI Score
  • nshcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Short Duration Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs AYBCX

14% FI Score
  • aybcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AllianzGI High Yield Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SCIX vs OBIVX

14% FI Score
  • obivx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Oberweis Small-Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo