RYSHX : Rydex Inverse Russell 2000® Strategy Fund Class H

RYSHX is a Alternatives Market Inverse with HIGH fees.

RYSHX

Rydex Inverse Russell 2000® Strategy Fund Class H

FI Score

27 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,987 Alternatives Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RYSHX vs TOPHX

35% FI Score
  • tophx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

The Tocqueville Phoenix Fund

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs NNCIX

35% FI Score
  • nncix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia North Carolina Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs NNGAX

35% FI Score
  • nngax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Nuveen Large-Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs NWAGX

35% FI Score
  • nwagx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Nationwide AllianzGI International Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs NWKBX

35% FI Score
  • nwkbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Nationwide Geneva Small Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs OIBCX

35% FI Score
  • oibcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer International Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs OOSCX

35% FI Score
  • ooscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs USSCX

35% FI Score
  • usscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

USAA Science & Technology Fund

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs WFALX

35% FI Score
  • wfalx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Wells Fargo Index Asset Allocation Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs RDLAX

35% FI Score
  • rdlax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Columbia Disciplined Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs PALCX

35% FI Score
  • palcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AllianzGI Global Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs PARQX

35% FI Score
  • parqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Putnam Short Duration Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs NWWOX

35% FI Score
  • nwwox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Virtus Vontobel Global Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs NAINX

35% FI Score
  • nainx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs NDACX

35% FI Score
  • ndacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Nationwide Investor Destinations Aggressive Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs MAGSX

35% FI Score
  • magsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Madison Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs MAAAX

35% FI Score
  • maaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

MainStay Epoch U.S. All Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs OCAIX

35% FI Score
  • ocaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Invesco Select Risk: High Growth Investor Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs MBGVX

35% FI Score
  • mbgvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund - Class N

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RYSHX vs MERAX

35% FI Score
  • merax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Madison Mid Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo