Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
0 /10
$RYRTX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,815 Sector Equity Consumer Cyclical funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- dcscx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Davis Appreciation & Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- jommx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
JOHCM Emerging Markets Small Mid Cap Equity Fund Class Institutional Shares
Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- flfgx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Meeder Global Allocation Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- iemcx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Invesco Emerging Markets Select Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- eclbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Parametric TABS 1-to-10 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hotfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
FundX Aggressive Upgrader Fund
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- cpiex
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- dhrox
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Diamond Hill Research Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- mpyix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Meritage Yield-Focus Equity Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- lsmcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Columbia Disciplined Small Core Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- aybax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AllianzGI High Yield Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- iscax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Federated International Small-Mid Company Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- fko
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Other Region
First Trust South Korea AlphaDEX Fund
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »
- pfadx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund Class R
Expenses: 2.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hwccx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- dvfnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Delaware Tax-Free New York Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vndfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Viking Tax-Free Fund for North Dakota Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dclvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Dunham Large Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »