Diversification Rating
9 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
8 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
8 /10
$RWX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,678 Sector Equity Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- cpatx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Counterpoint Tactical Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pimex
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Putnam Intermediate-Term Municipal Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- glnax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Global New Discovery Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- qabgx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Federated MDT Balanced Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- apgrx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Yorktown Growth Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- sscex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Columbia Disciplined Small Core Fund Class V
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- lzsmx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- croc
- ETF
- Alternative
- Inverse
ProShares UltraShort Australian Dollar
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- cvisx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Causeway International Small Cap Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- fppax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Prudent Investor Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pfdox
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- nafox
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Nuveen Oregon Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cvlcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Calamos Global Growth & Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- afalx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Applied Finance Core Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- jtqax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
John Hancock ESG International Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- durax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
DWS ESG International Core Equity Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- ggrcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- nwjtx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Nationwide Loomis Short Term Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »