RWM : ProShares Short Russell2000

RWM is a Alternative Market Inverse with HIGH fees.

RWM

ProShares Short Russell2000

FI Score

47 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,127 Alternative Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RWM vs SEUPX

18% FI Score
  • seupx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs SIEAX

18% FI Score
  • sieax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

AIG International Dividend Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs SZGCX

18% FI Score
  • szgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • International

DWS ESG Global Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs TEFQX

18% FI Score
  • tefqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs THBVX

18% FI Score
  • thbvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

THB Asset Management MicroCap Fund Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs THYCX

18% FI Score
  • thycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Touchstone High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs TMNAX

18% FI Score
  • tmnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs TNACX

18% FI Score
  • tnacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2030 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs USERX

18% FI Score
  • userx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

U.S. Global Investors Gold and Precious Metals Fund

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs USPVX

18% FI Score
  • uspvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Union Street Partners Value Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs VRECX

18% FI Score
  • vrecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2030 Fund Class CX

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs WHYCX

18% FI Score
  • whycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Wells Fargo High Yield Municipal Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs XMPT

18% FI Score
  • xmpt
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

VanEck Vectors CEF Municipal Income ETF

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs CARZ

18% FI Score
  • carz
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs AIAFX

18% FI Score
  • aiafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

Aberdeen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs AMGCX

18% FI Score
  • amgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs LPCPX

18% FI Score
  • lpcpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2050 Porfolio Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs LPHIX

18% FI Score
  • lphix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2045 Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs AUBAX

18% FI Score
  • aubax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco World Bond Factor Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RWM vs DUGCX

18% FI Score
  • dugcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Delaware Strategic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo