RLGCX : RiverFront Asset Allocation Growth & Income Class C

RLGCX is a Allocation Market Total World with HIGH fees.

RLGCX

RiverFront Asset Allocation Growth & Income Class C

FI Score

26 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Similar Funds

We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RLGCX vs PQICX

26% FI Score
  • pqicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PIMCO Dividend and Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLGCX vs AVEWX

26% FI Score
  • avewx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Ave Maria World Equity Fund

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLGCX vs HRLCX

26% FI Score
  • hrlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

The Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLGCX vs GDMOX

26% FI Score
  • gdmox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Lazard Global Dynamic Multi-Asset Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLGCX vs IMNAX

26% FI Score
  • imnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Transamerica Global Equity Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLGCX vs NQGCX

26% FI Score
  • nqgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nuveen NWQ Global Equity Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLGCX vs PIPTX

26% FI Score
  • piptx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Virtus KAR Global Quality Dividend Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLGCX vs LPFAX

26% FI Score
  • lpfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLGCX vs LPERX

25% FI Score
  • lperx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLGCX vs COGAX

25% FI Score
  • cogax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Columbia Select Global Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLGCX vs YASSX

25% FI Score
  • yassx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLGCX vs LVAFX

25% FI Score
  • lvafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLGCX vs CAMAX

25% FI Score
  • camax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Cambiar Global Ultra Focus Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLGCX vs FHSIX

25% FI Score
  • fhsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Federated Hermes Global Small Cap Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLGCX vs EFGIX

25% FI Score
  • efgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Focused Global Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLGCX vs TRXIX

25% FI Score
  • trxix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLGCX vs RAYLX

25% FI Score
  • raylx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Conductor Global Equity Value Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLGCX vs ESVIX

25% FI Score
  • esvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Global Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLGCX vs CAGEX

25% FI Score
  • cagex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Calamos Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLGCX vs EKGCX

25% FI Score
  • ekgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Wells Fargo Global Small Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo