RHS : Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF

RHS is a Sector Equity Market Consumer Defensive with MODERATE fees.

RHS

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF

FI Score

63 /100

Diversification Rating

9 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Consumer Defensive funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RHS vs PYICX

24% FI Score
  • pyicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pioneer High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs CSOAX

24% FI Score
  • csoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Credit Suisse Strategic Income Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs RYCQX

24% FI Score
  • rycqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse Russell 2000® Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs SUVBX

24% FI Score
  • suvbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

PGIM QMA Large-Cap Value Fund- Class B

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs TSLCX

24% FI Score
  • tslcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Transamerica Small Cap Value C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs SLCGX

24% FI Score
  • slcgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs SSCDX

24% FI Score
  • sscdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs SSVSX

24% FI Score
  • ssvsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Victory Special Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs DRESX

24% FI Score
  • dresx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs YXI

24% FI Score
  • yxi
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short FTSE China 50

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs DVECX

24% FI Score
  • dvecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Delaware Select Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs EACPX

24% FI Score
  • eacpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs EBSAX

24% FI Score
  • ebsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Equinox Campbell Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs EPDIX

24% FI Score
  • epdix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs EQAIX

24% FI Score
  • eqaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

AXS Aspect Core Diversified Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs ETADX

24% FI Score
  • etadx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs ETAMX

24% FI Score
  • etamx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Eventide Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs ETNMX

24% FI Score
  • etnmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Eventide Multi-Asset Income Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs FAKDX

24% FI Score
  • fakdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Kempner Multi-Cap Deep Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs FDTS

24% FI Score
  • fdts
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo