Expense Ratio Rating
0 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$RGSCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- bgvix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Brandes Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- cennx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Centerstone Investors Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- iaopx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Global Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mevox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Managed Equity Volatility Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- wagox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wasatch Global Opportunities Fund® Investor Class
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- vicex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
USA Mutuals Vitium Global Fund Investor Class Shares
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gdmox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Global Dynamic Multi-Asset Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- imnax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Transamerica Global Equity Class A
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rlgcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
RiverFront Asset Allocation Growth & Income Class C
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »