RALS : ProShares RAFI Long/Short

RALS is a Alternatives Market Neutral with LOW fees.

RALS

ProShares RAFI Long/Short

FI Score

27 /100

Diversification Rating

4 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,115 Alternatives Neutral funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RALS vs SCUPX

42% FI Score
  • scupx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Principal Strategic Asset Management Flexible Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs OIBAX

42% FI Score
  • oibax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer International Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs DHICX

42% FI Score
  • dhicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Wells Fargo Strategic Municipal Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs WFVDX

42% FI Score
  • wfvdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Wells Fargo International Value Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs SKSIX

42% FI Score
  • sksix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

AMG Managers Skyline Special Equities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs SILVX

42% FI Score
  • silvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

SGI U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs MTDKX

42% FI Score
  • mtdkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target Income Series Class K

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs OMSOX

42% FI Score
  • omsox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco Oppenheimer Main Street All Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs SMDSX

42% FI Score
  • smdsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs SHIYX

42% FI Score
  • shiyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Western Asset Short Duration High Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs GCSAX

42% FI Score
  • gcsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs ERBAX

42% FI Score
  • erbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs CAMOX

42% FI Score
  • camox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Cambiar Opportunity Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs EUDV

42% FI Score
  • eudv
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs SLMCX

42% FI Score
  • slmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Columbia Seligman Communications and Information Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs JCAFX

42% FI Score
  • jcafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

John Hancock California Tax Free Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs EUM

42% FI Score
  • eum
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs BAL

42% FI Score
  • bal
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Cotton Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs BCBDX

42% FI Score
  • bcbdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs RNDM

42% FI Score
  • rndm
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

First Trust Developed International Equity Select ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo