QVAL : Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF

QVAL is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Value with LOW fees.

QVAL

Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF

FI Score

50 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,182 US Stocks Mid-Cap Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare QVAL vs PGJAX

15% FI Score
  • pgjax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs MFMLX

15% FI Score
  • mfmlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Frontier Markets Portfolio Class L

Expenses: 2.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs GUMCX

15% FI Score
  • gumcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

Guggenheim Market Neutral Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs FTIIX

15% FI Score
  • ftiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Federated Global Total Return Bond Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs MCLTX

15% FI Score
  • mcltx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Latin America Stock

BlackRock Latin America Fund, Inc. Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Latin America Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs ARECX

15% FI Score
  • arecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

AB Global Real Estate Investment Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs LPVIX

15% FI Score
  • lpvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2055 Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs HLDAX

15% FI Score
  • hldax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs EFECX

15% FI Score
  • efecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs MSULX

15% FI Score
  • msulx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class L

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs EIXAX

15% FI Score
  • eixax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs PCYIX

15% FI Score
  • pcyix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

PCS Commodity Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs MFHVX

15% FI Score
  • mfhvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Mesirow Financial High Yield Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs EMDAX

15% FI Score
  • emdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund-Class A

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs HLFNX

15% FI Score
  • hlfnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs LPHCX

15% FI Score
  • lphcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2045 Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs LWEAX

15% FI Score
  • lweax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Western Asset Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs UJPIX

15% FI Score
  • ujpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds UltraJapan Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs ATMCX

15% FI Score
  • atmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Strategic Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare QVAL vs KOIN

14% FI Score
  • koin
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Innovation Shares NextGen Protocol ETF

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo