Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$QIVCX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,369 International Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- wwnpx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Kinetics Paradigm Fund No Load Class
Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- wwsix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
TETON Westwood SmallCap Equity Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- brugx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- bvsix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Baywood Socially Responsible Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- bgvix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Brandes Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- dfdsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- dfbax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Delaware Strategic Allocation Class A
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- lnycx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Columbia New York Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ltmdx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
MFS Lifetime 2045 Fund Class C
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »