OPAMX : Invesco Oppenheimer Municipal Fund Class A

OPAMX is a Bond Market Municipal Bond with HIGH fees.

OPAMX

Invesco Oppenheimer Municipal Fund Class A

FI Score

36 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

2 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare OPAMX vs MRLBX

31% FI Score
  • mrlbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Real Estate Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs MRVIX

31% FI Score
  • mrvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

BMO Mid-Cap Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs TGMEX

31% FI Score
  • tgmex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

TCW Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Opportunities Fund N Share Class

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs LZISX

31% FI Score
  • lzisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs PZVEX

31% FI Score
  • pzvex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Investor

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs PURBX

31% FI Score
  • purbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

PGIM Global Real Estate Fund- Class B

Expenses: 2.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs MCSPX

31% FI Score
  • mcspx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

BlackRock Advantage U.S. Total Market Fund, Inc.Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs IVJAX

31% FI Score
  • ivjax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Ivy International Small Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs RGCEX

31% FI Score
  • rgcex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Columbia Select Global Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs RMBBX

31% FI Score
  • rmbbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

RMB Small Cap Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs MWOBX

31% FI Score
  • mwobx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global Growth Fund Class B

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs FPRAX

31% FI Score
  • fprax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

FPA Paramount Fund

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs FSBBX

31% FI Score
  • fsbbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Federated Global Allocation Fund Class B Shares

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs MSIBX

31% FI Score
  • msibx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs RYTMX

31% FI Score
  • rytmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs SEMCX

31% FI Score
  • semcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Mid-Cap Portfolio Fund Class F

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs FSLEX

31% FI Score
  • fslex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

Fidelity® Select Envir and Alt Energy Portfolio

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs WFLHX

31% FI Score
  • wflhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Wells Fargo Target 2055 Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs SGAPX

31% FI Score
  • sgapx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Virtus SGA Global Growth I Class

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs EXHAX

31% FI Score
  • exhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series Class S

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo