OMFS : Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF

OMFS is a US Stocks Market Small Blend with LOW fees.

OMFS

Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF

FI Score

45 /100

Diversification Rating

3 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare OMFS vs RAALX

18% FI Score
  • raalx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Conductor Global Equity Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OMFS vs ECRRX

18% FI Score
  • ecrrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OMFS vs SAESX

18% FI Score
  • saesx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

AIG Japan Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OMFS vs GURCX

17% FI Score
  • gurcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OMFS vs SFGCX

17% FI Score
  • sfgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Guggenheim World Equity Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OMFS vs FGOCX

17% FI Score
  • fgocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated Government Income Securities Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OMFS vs SNGRX

17% FI Score
  • sngrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Sit International Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OMFS vs HSIEX

17% FI Score
  • hsiex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

Hussman Strategic International Fund

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OMFS vs HYLD

17% FI Score
  • hyld
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

High Yield ETF

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OMFS vs ICMBX

17% FI Score
  • icmbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Intrepid Capital Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OMFS vs ICOPX

17% FI Score
  • icopx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OMFS vs ICTVX

17% FI Score
  • ictvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

ICON Utilities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OMFS vs IIXAX

17% FI Score
  • iixax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Insider Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OMFS vs LPBCX

17% FI Score
  • lpbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2025 Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OMFS vs GARBX

17% FI Score
  • garbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Guinness Atkinson Renminbi Yuan & Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OMFS vs IOCZX

17% FI Score
  • ioczx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

ICON Risk-Managed Balanced Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OMFS vs GLLAX

17% FI Score
  • gllax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Aberdeen Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OMFS vs GNDCX

17% FI Score
  • gndcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Low Volatility Equity Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OMFS vs UTPIX

17% FI Score
  • utpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare OMFS vs QCBGX

17% FI Score
  • qcbgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Federated MDT Balanced Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo