NMSAX : Columbia Small Cap Index Fund Class A

NMSAX is a US Stocks Market Small Blend index fund with LOW fees.

NMSAX

Columbia Small Cap Index Fund Class A

FI Score

76 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NMSAX vs MSMTX

22% FI Score
  • msmtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Morgan Stanley Mortgage Securities Trust Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs GTNDX

22% FI Score
  • gtndx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Low Volatility Equity Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs DXRLX

22% FI Score
  • dxrlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Monthly Small Cap Bull 2X Fund

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs EPVIX

22% FI Score
  • epvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

EuroPac International Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs GREAX

22% FI Score
  • greax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs OEMAX

22% FI Score
  • oemax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs CROC

22% FI Score
  • croc
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Australian Dollar

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs EQCHX

22% FI Score
  • eqchx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs NWJTX

22% FI Score
  • nwjtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nationwide Loomis Short Term Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs QABGX

22% FI Score
  • qabgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Federated MDT Balanced Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs BMPCX

22% FI Score
  • bmpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

BlackRock US Mortgage Portfolio Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs AVACX

22% FI Score
  • avacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Municipal Income Fund II Virginia Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs GURPX

22% FI Score
  • gurpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs IREAX

22% FI Score
  • ireax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Ivy LaSalle Global Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs CIGCX

22% FI Score
  • cigcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Calamos International Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs HCMEX

22% FI Score
  • hcmex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

HCM Income Plus Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs BATT

22% FI Score
  • batt
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Amplify Advanced Battery Metals and Materials ETF

Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs FAUS

22% FI Score
  • faus
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

First Trust Australia AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs CGAVX

22% FI Score
  • cgavx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

Causeway Global Absolute Return Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs KARS

22% FI Score
  • kars
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo