MULSX : Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Ultra-Short Income Portfolio Class IR

MULSX is a Alternative Market Short with LOW fees.

MULSX

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Ultra-Short Income Portfolio Class IR

FI Score

74 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

8 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,034 Alternative Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MULSX vs FSDPX

47% FI Score
  • fsdpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Fidelity® Select Materials Portfolio

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs VGFO

47% FI Score
  • vgfo
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Virtus WMC Global Factor Opportunities ETF

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs FMN

47% FI Score
  • fmn
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund

Expenses: 2.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs BSJP

47% FI Score
  • bsjp
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs ERH

47% FI Score
  • erh
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Wells Fargo Utilities and High Income Fund

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs SFIG

47% FI Score
  • sfig
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs OSINX

47% FI Score
  • osinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Strategic Income Class R

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs BGNAX

47% FI Score
  • bgnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

American Century Ginnie Mae Fund A Class

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs SEKIX

47% FI Score
  • sekix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs CPCFX

47% FI Score
  • cpcfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs DLGBX

47% FI Score
  • dlgbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

DoubleLine Global Bond Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs URA

47% FI Score
  • ura
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Global X Uranium ETF

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs LUBIX

47% FI Score
  • lubix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Thrivent Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs EOD

47% FI Score
  • eod
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Wells Fargo Global Dividend Opportunity Fund

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs SDVGX

47% FI Score
  • sdvgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Sit Dividend Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs LIFAX

47% FI Score
  • lifax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs CEMVX

47% FI Score
  • cemvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Causeway Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs GQRIX

47% FI Score
  • gqrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs FPL

47% FI Score
  • fpl
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Master Limited Partnership

First Trust New Opps MLP & Energy Fund

Expenses: 2.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Master Limited Partnership Other fund. See why »

Compare MULSX vs UTBPX

47% FI Score
  • utbpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

UBS Total Return Bond Fund Class P

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo