MSOPX : Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Opportunity Portfolio Class C

MSOPX is a Allocation Market Total World with HIGH fees.

MSOPX

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Opportunity Portfolio Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,682 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MSOPX vs BNKD

27% FI Score
  • bnkd
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MSOPX vs MSDCX

27% FI Score
  • msdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Wells Fargo Short Duration Government Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSOPX vs LZGIX

27% FI Score
  • lzgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lazard Global Fixed Income Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSOPX vs PSLBX

27% FI Score
  • pslbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Putnam Small Cap Value Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSOPX vs PSLCX

27% FI Score
  • pslcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Putnam Small Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSOPX vs PYELX

27% FI Score
  • pyelx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSOPX vs MFCDX

27% FI Score
  • mfcdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Marketfield Fund Class C

Expenses: 3.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MSOPX vs IWIRX

27% FI Score
  • iwirx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Guinness Atkinson™ Global Innovators Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSOPX vs MFHIX

27% FI Score
  • mfhix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Mesirow Financial High Yield Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSOPX vs JAQTX

27% FI Score
  • jaqtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Janus Henderson Asia Equity Fund Class T

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSOPX vs MXFBX

27% FI Score
  • mxfbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MainStay Floating Rate Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSOPX vs MXFCX

27% FI Score
  • mxfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MainStay Floating Rate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSOPX vs MYCTX

27% FI Score
  • myctx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

MainStay MacKay U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSOPX vs MYICX

27% FI Score
  • myicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

MainStay MacKay International Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSOPX vs IEGAX

27% FI Score
  • iegax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Invesco International Small Company Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSOPX vs IEMJX

27% FI Score
  • iemjx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSOPX vs NGIMX

27% FI Score
  • ngimx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Georgia Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSOPX vs SAHIX

27% FI Score
  • sahix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Virtus Seix High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSOPX vs TMCAX

27% FI Score
  • tmcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSOPX vs NRFAX

27% FI Score
  • nrfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo