MFFSX : MFS Lifetime 2050 Fund Class A

MFFSX is a Allocation Market Target-Date with MODERATE fees.

MFFSX

MFS Lifetime 2050 Fund Class A

FI Score

59 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

8 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,682 Allocation Target-Date funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MFFSX vs ABQCX

29% FI Score
  • abqcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

AB Total Return Bond Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare MFFSX vs SHIAX

29% FI Score
  • shiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Western Asset Short Duration High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MFFSX vs WISNX

29% FI Score
  • wisnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

William Blair International Small Cap Growth Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MFFSX vs VSLAX

29% FI Score
  • vslax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MFFSX vs WAIOX

29% FI Score
  • waiox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Wasatch International Opportunities Fund® Investor Class

Expenses: 2.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MFFSX vs WBIL

29% FI Score
  • wbil
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MFFSX vs TETIX

29% FI Score
  • tetix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

RBC Enterprise Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MFFSX vs PRACX

29% FI Score
  • pracx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Putnam Research Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MFFSX vs TPYYX

29% FI Score
  • tpyyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Touchstone International ESG Equity Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MFFSX vs SCSSX

29% FI Score
  • scssx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare MFFSX vs KBWD

29% FI Score
  • kbwd
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MFFSX vs SBFAX

29% FI Score
  • sbfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

1919 Financial Services Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MFFSX vs SCCPX

29% FI Score
  • sccpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Sterling Capital Corporate Fund Institutional shares

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MFFSX vs SIRCX

29% FI Score
  • sircx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Sierra Tactical All Asset Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare MFFSX vs SEVPX

29% FI Score
  • sevpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MFFSX vs JOAMX

29% FI Score
  • joamx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

JOHCM Asia Ex-Japan Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MFFSX vs TEPIX

29% FI Score
  • tepix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MFFSX vs TFLIX

29% FI Score
  • tflix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Transamerica Floating Rate Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MFFSX vs WFHYX

29% FI Score
  • wfhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Wells Fargo Short-Term High Yield Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MFFSX vs THHYX

29% FI Score
  • thhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Toews Tactical Income Fund

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo