Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$MECGX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks Emerging Markets funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- jabax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ffrhx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Fidelity® Floating Rate High Income Fund
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fmeix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Fidelity® Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- lmbs
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
First Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF
Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fhyqx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Franklin High Yield Tax Free Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ltpz
- ETF
- Bond
- Government Bond
PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index Exchange-Traded Fund
Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jobex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
JPMorgan SmartRetirement® Blend 2040 Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.37% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- jkj
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- mbfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund - Class A
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »