MCSMX : Matthews China Small Companies Fund

MCSMX is a International Stocks Market China Stock with HIGH fees.

MCSMX

Matthews China Small Companies Fund

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MCSMX vs MERKX

14% FI Score
  • merkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Merk Hard Currency Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs OBIVX

14% FI Score
  • obivx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Oberweis Small-Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs NGINX

14% FI Score
  • nginx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Georgia Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs LQNIX

14% FI Score
  • lqnix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

QS Global Market Neutral Fund Class I

Expenses: 3.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs NSHCX

14% FI Score
  • nshcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Short Duration Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs IMSAX

14% FI Score
  • imsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

IMS Dividend Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs MISEX

14% FI Score
  • misex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Midas Magic

Expenses: 3.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs EAREX

14% FI Score
  • earex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Eaton Vance Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs NEAGX

14% FI Score
  • neagx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs INSCX

14% FI Score
  • inscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Catalyst Insider Buying Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs BOGSX

14% FI Score
  • bogsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs VWMCX

14% FI Score
  • vwmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Virtus Horizon Wealth Masters Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs WCPIX

14% FI Score
  • wcpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Communication Services UltraSector ProFund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs LSHAX

14% FI Score
  • lshax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund Advisor Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs JAMFX

14% FI Score
  • jamfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Jacob Internet Investor Class

Expenses: 2.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs RMBCX

14% FI Score
  • rmbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

RMB Mendon Financial Long/Short Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs TAAGX

14% FI Score
  • taagx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Timothy Aggressive Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs SBQAX

14% FI Score
  • sbqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

AmericaFirst Large Cap Share Buyback Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs XVZ

14% FI Score
  • xvz
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Volatility

iPath S&P 500 Dynamic VIX ETN

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Volatility Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs PPTCX

14% FI Score
  • pptcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Virtus KAR Global Quality Dividend Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo