MCSMX : Matthews China Small Companies Fund

MCSMX is a International Stocks Market China Stock with HIGH fees.

MCSMX

Matthews China Small Companies Fund

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MCSMX vs HANAX

14% FI Score
  • hanax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hanlon Managed Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs LCTIX

14% FI Score
  • lctix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Leader Capital Leader Total Return Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs AMJCX

14% FI Score
  • amjcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

American Century Multi-Asset Income Fund C Class

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs NEHCX

14% FI Score
  • nehcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Loomis Sayles High Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs EPIBX

14% FI Score
  • epibx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

EuroPac International Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs HTACX

14% FI Score
  • htacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Highland Total Return Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs NERCX

14% FI Score
  • nercx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs AGCCX

14% FI Score
  • agccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AB Unconstrained Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs RYAZX

14% FI Score
  • ryazx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs CGFIX

14% FI Score
  • cgfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Aberdeen Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund Institutional Service Class

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs AHDCX

14% FI Score
  • ahdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Century High-Yield Fund C Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs NGQCX

14% FI Score
  • ngqcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Neuberger Berman Integrated Large Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs BUYAX

14% FI Score
  • buyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Catalyst Buyback Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs KOIN

14% FI Score
  • koin
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Innovation Shares NextGen Protocol ETF

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs EFCNX

14% FI Score
  • efcnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Emerald Insights Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs EIM

14% FI Score
  • eim
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund

Expenses: 2.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs RYCWX

14% FI Score
  • rycwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse Dow 2x Strategy Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs ARLSX

14% FI Score
  • arlsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AMG River Road Long-Short Fund Class N

Expenses: 2.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs PXRAX

14% FI Score
  • pxrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Virtus Duff & Phelps International Real Estate Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs RYRRX

14% FI Score
  • ryrrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Rydex Russell 2000 Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo