MCSMX : Matthews China Small Companies Fund

MCSMX is a International Stocks Market China Stock with HIGH fees.

MCSMX

Matthews China Small Companies Fund

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MCSMX vs TMPFX

  • tmpfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund

Expenses: 100.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs RYRCX

  • ryrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclical

Rydex Retailing Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclical Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs SBMBX

  • sbmbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Portfolio Fund Class A

Expenses: 3.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs SEPCX

  • sepcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Portfolio Fund Class C

Expenses: 4.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs PDFDX

  • pdfdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Perkins Discovery Fund

Expenses: 2.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs DGQUX

  • dgqux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AmericaFirst Defensive Growth Fund Class U

Expenses: 3.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs RYCSX

  • rycsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Rydex Telecommunications Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs SEPIX

  • sepix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Portfolio Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 3.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo