MCSMX : Matthews China Small Companies Fund

MCSMX is a International Stocks Market China Stock with HIGH fees.

MCSMX

Matthews China Small Companies Fund

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MCSMX vs RYTLX

  • rytlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Rydex Telecommunications Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs RYVCX

  • ryvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Rydex Energy Services Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs NGRCX

  • ngrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Neuberger Berman Global Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs MIDSX

  • midsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Midas Fund

Expenses: 4.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs ACT

  • act
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

AdvisorShares Vice ETF

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs ASFTX

  • asftx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Arrow Dynamic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs DGQAX

  • dgqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AmericaFirst Defensive Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 3.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs EKAR

  • ekar
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

Ideanomics Shares NextGen Vhcl andTchETF

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs SFPAX

  • sfpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Saratoga Financial Service Portfolio Fund Class A

Expenses: 3.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs LEOOX

  • leoox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lazard Enhanced Opportunities Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 2.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo