MCDFX : Matthews China Dividend Fund Investor Class

MCDFX is a International Stocks Market China Stock with HIGH fees.

MCDFX

Matthews China Dividend Fund Investor Class

FI Score

45 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MCDFX vs RYMBX

  • rymbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Rydex Commodities Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare MCDFX vs SBHIX

  • sbhix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Saratoga Health & Biotechnology Portfolio Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MCDFX vs TINIX

  • tinix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

ACM Tactical Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCDFX vs NHS

  • nhs
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies

Expenses: 3.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCDFX vs NHSCX

  • nhscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Short Duration High Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCDFX vs NUBCX

  • nubcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Unconstrained Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCDFX vs ATYAX

  • atyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Ascendant Tactical Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCDFX vs DGQIX

  • dgqix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AmericaFirst Defensive Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 2.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MCDFX vs HIICX

  • hiicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst/SMH High Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCDFX vs UAUD

  • uaud
  • ETF
  • Money Market
  • World

Citigroup ETNs linked to the VelocityShares Daily 4X Long AUD vs. USD Index

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo