LUBAX : Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund Class A

LUBAX is a Alternative Market Short with HIGH fees.

LUBAX

Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund Class A

FI Score

63 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,034 Alternative Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LUBAX vs JSVIX

16% FI Score
  • jsvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

James Alpha Structured Credit Value Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs MCLGX

16% FI Score
  • mclgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Mirae Asset Emerging Markets Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs DNDGX

16% FI Score
  • dndgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs EAIIX

16% FI Score
  • eaiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs APITX

16% FI Score
  • apitx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Yorktown Growth Fund Class L

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs PHECX

16% FI Score
  • phecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • International

PGIM Global Total Return (USD Hedged) Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs ASIDX

16% FI Score
  • asidx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

American Century Multi-Asset Real Return Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs DGRPX

16% FI Score
  • dgrpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Delaware Global Real Estate Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs OEMCX

16% FI Score
  • oemcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs APRAX

16% FI Score
  • aprax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

AAM/Phocas Real Estate Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs GLBLX

16% FI Score
  • glblx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Leuthold Global Fund Class Retail

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs LSTOX

16% FI Score
  • lstox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Lazard Global Strategic Equity Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs HANIX

16% FI Score
  • hanix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hanlon Managed Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs NEEGX

16% FI Score
  • neegx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Needham Growth Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs GRECX

16% FI Score
  • grecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs ASIHX

16% FI Score
  • asihx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

American Century Strategic Income Fund C Class

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs HPECX

16% FI Score
  • hpecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Highland Socially Responsible Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs ECSMX

16% FI Score
  • ecsmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs PFSRX

16% FI Score
  • pfsrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Virtus Newfleet Senior Floating Rate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs OFSCX

16% FI Score
  • ofscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Olstein Strategic Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo