LSFCX : Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund Class C

LSFCX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

LSFCX

Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund Class C

FI Score

30 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LSFCX vs NDVBX

42% FI Score
  • ndvbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

MFS New Discovery Value Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs NDVCX

42% FI Score
  • ndvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

MFS New Discovery Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs MSCFX

42% FI Score
  • mscfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs BCM

42% FI Score
  • bcm
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Broad

iPath Pure Beta Broad Commodity ETN

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs OCRDX

42% FI Score
  • ocrdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco Oppenheimer Rising Dividends Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs RNDM

42% FI Score
  • rndm
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

First Trust Developed International Equity Select ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs EDIIX

42% FI Score
  • ediix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Global Income Builder Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs HDIVX

42% FI Score
  • hdivx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Janus Henderson Dividend & Income Builder Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs QLENX

42% FI Score
  • qlenx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N

Expenses: 2.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs QDYN

42% FI Score
  • qdyn
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

FlexShares Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund

Expenses: 0.37% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs MFWBX

42% FI Score
  • mfwbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global Total Return Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs MEQFX

42% FI Score
  • meqfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AMG FQ Long-Short Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs SCUPX

42% FI Score
  • scupx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Principal Strategic Asset Management Flexible Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs VIMCX

42% FI Score
  • vimcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs VARIX

42% FI Score
  • varix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Virtus Rampart Sector Trend Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs LCGNX

42% FI Score
  • lcgnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs OUSM

42% FI Score
  • ousm
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

O'Shares FTSE Russell Small Cap Quality Dividend ETF

Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs GCSAX

42% FI Score
  • gcsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs MFWCX

42% FI Score
  • mfwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global Total Return Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs AWSAX

42% FI Score
  • awsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Core Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo