Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$LSAGX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- peqbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Putnam Global Equity Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- sglix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
SGI Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ktrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
DWS Global Income Builder Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jeibx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund- Class B
Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- asuax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AllianzGI Global Sustainability Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pugcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Putnam Global Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ekgix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wells Fargo Global Small Cap Fund Class Inst
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- igeix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Voya Global Equity Dividend Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- appix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Appleseed Fund Institutional Share
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »