Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$JMTCX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,623 Bond Total US Bond Market funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- fuqix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund
Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- veipx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Vanguard Equity-Income Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.27% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- naesx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Vanguard Small Capitalization Index Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.17% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- vone
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund ETF Shares
Expenses: 0.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- vbinx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- vimsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.17% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- vdigx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.27% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- vug
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares
Expenses: 0.04% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- spyv
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
Expenses: 0.04% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »