Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$JENSX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- anfcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
American Funds The New Economy Fund® Class C
Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tgcex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
TCW Select Equities Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- mshlx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Growth Portfolio Class L
Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- gaegx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Columbia Large Cap Growth Fund Class V
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tcrax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
American Century Growth Fund A Class
Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ekonx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Wells Fargo Omega Growth Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- prefx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
T. Rowe Price Tax-Efficient Equity Fund
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pmom
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Principal Sustainable Momentum Index ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- miln
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Global X Millennials Thematic ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »