Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$JEDAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- hyls
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF
Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bgx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Blackstone/GSO Long-Short Credit Income Fund
Expenses: 3.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ardc
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc.
Expenses: 3.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- edd
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund
Expenses: 3.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bwg
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BrandywineGLOBAL â Global Income Opportunities Fund
Expenses: 3.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mdhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- plhix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pacific Funds High Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gfrax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gilfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund C-Class
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »