HWLIX : Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund Class I

HWLIX is a US Stocks Market Large Value with MODERATE fees.

HWLIX

Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund Class I

FI Score

40 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,043 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare HWLIX vs MAPCX

39% FI Score
  • mapcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

BlackRock Asian Dragon Fund,Inc.Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs DVYA

39% FI Score
  • dvya
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific Stock

iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs DMBZX

39% FI Score
  • dmbzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BNY Mellon Opportunistic Municipal Securities Fund Class Z

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs PBW

39% FI Score
  • pbw
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs FIHD

39% FI Score
  • fihd
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

UBS AG FI Enhanced Global High Yield ETN

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs FMTAX

39% FI Score
  • fmtax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Federated Short-Intermediate Duration Municipal Trust Class A Shares

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs WBIGX

39% FI Score
  • wbigx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

William Blair International Growth Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs PBPAX

39% FI Score
  • pbpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs CTTLX

39% FI Score
  • cttlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Calvert Responsible Municipal Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs GIOPX

39% FI Score
  • giopx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Guggenheim Macro Opportunities Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs TAN

39% FI Score
  • tan
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

Invesco Solar ETF

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs RMBTX

39% FI Score
  • rmbtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

RMB International Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs WBENX

39% FI Score
  • wbenx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

William Blair Emerging Markets Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs PAIIX

39% FI Score
  • paiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • International

PIMCO Global Bond Opportunities Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs PADAX

39% FI Score
  • padax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs PAEBX

39% FI Score
  • paebx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Growth Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs IOFCX

39% FI Score
  • iofcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

AlphaCentric Income Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs PABBX

39% FI Score
  • pabbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs EDI

39% FI Score
  • edi
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Total Income Fund

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs STCCX

39% FI Score
  • stccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Principal Short-Term Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo