HWLIX : Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund Class I

HWLIX is a US Stocks Market Large Value with MODERATE fees.

HWLIX

Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund Class I

FI Score

40 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,043 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare HWLIX vs WBIGX

39% FI Score
  • wbigx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

William Blair International Growth Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs MECGX

39% FI Score
  • mecgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Mirae Asset Emerging Markets Great Consumer Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs SWMIX

39% FI Score
  • swmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Laudus International MarketMasters Fund™

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs EMGCX

39% FI Score
  • emgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund - Class C

Expenses: 2.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs DGLCX

39% FI Score
  • dglcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs CRARX

39% FI Score
  • crarx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

MainStay CBRE Real Estate Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs EDF

39% FI Score
  • edf
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs DWGCX

39% FI Score
  • dwgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

American Funds Developing World Growth and Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs ORSCX

39% FI Score
  • orscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Short Term Municipal Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs JPS

39% FI Score
  • jps
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Preferred Stock

Nuveen Preferred & Income Securities Fund

Expenses: 3.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Preferred Stock Other fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs WBENX

39% FI Score
  • wbenx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

William Blair Emerging Markets Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs JOBIX

39% FI Score
  • jobix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

JOHCM Global Income Builder Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs GLVAX

39% FI Score
  • glvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Focus Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs HYXE

39% FI Score
  • hyxe
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

iShares iBoxx $ High Yield ex Oil & Gas Corporate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs LNYAX

39% FI Score
  • lnyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia New York Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs SBAPX

39% FI Score
  • sbapx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Segall Bryant & Hamill Short Term Plus Fund Institutional

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs MAPIX

39% FI Score
  • mapix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific Stock

Matthews Asia Dividend Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs STCCX

39% FI Score
  • stccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Principal Short-Term Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs ITTSX

39% FI Score
  • ittsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Hartford Multi-Asset Income and Growth Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs GAINX

39% FI Score
  • gainx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder Fund

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo