Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$HTY Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- temqx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Franklin Mutual Quest Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- msflx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio Class L
Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- tagbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Templeton Global Balanced Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hrlyx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- eto
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund
Expenses: 2.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- tedsx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- bpglx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
UBS Global Allocation Fund Class P
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mbaax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Global Strategist Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- oargx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Oakmark Global Fund Service Class
Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »