HRLSX : Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class R4

HRLSX is a Allocation Market Total World with HIGH fees.

HRLSX

Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class R4

FI Score

35 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Similar Funds

We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare HRLSX vs ECDIX

33% FI Score
  • ecdix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs MGLBX

33% FI Score
  • mglbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Marsico Global Fund

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs PGMAX

33% FI Score
  • pgmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PIMCO Global Core Asset Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs EVGBC

33% FI Score
  • evgbc
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Global Income Builder NextShares

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs GPROX

33% FI Score
  • gprox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs HRLAX

33% FI Score
  • hrlax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs FMIEX

33% FI Score
  • fmiex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Wasatch Global Value Fund™ Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs MGQIX

33% FI Score
  • mgqix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Sustain Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs MECDX

33% FI Score
  • mecdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs MCRO

33% FI Score
  • mcro
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

IQ Hedge Macro Tracker ETF

Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs MCGCX

33% FI Score
  • mcgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs UGEIX

33% FI Score
  • ugeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

USAA Global Equity Income Fund Fund Shares

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs WGGNX

33% FI Score
  • wggnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

William Blair Global Leaders Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs TFIV

33% FI Score
  • tfiv
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Global X TargetIncome 5 ETF

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs DAYFX

33% FI Score
  • dayfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AlphaSimplex Multi-Asset Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs LSGGX

32% FI Score
  • lsggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs ARTHX

32% FI Score
  • arthx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Artisan Global Equity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs CSRCX

32% FI Score
  • csrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Columbia Global Dividend Opportunity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs AGLCX

32% FI Score
  • aglcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

American Century Focused Global Growth Fund C Class

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs MWOCX

32% FI Score
  • mwocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo