• mglax
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Real Estate

MFS Global Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

• mgrbx
• Mutual Fund
• International Stocks
• Large Growth

MFS International Growth Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

• mgrcx
• Mutual Fund
• International Stocks
• Large Growth

MFS International Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

• lifax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Government Bond

Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

• btmax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

BMO Short-Term Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• tapr
• ETF
• Alternative
• Inverse

Barclays Inverse US Treasury Aggregate ETN

Expenses: 0.43% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

• mdiv
• ETF
• Allocation
• All-In-One

First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

• posax
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Real Estate

Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

• ppsc
• ETF
• Alternative
• Leveraged Equities

PortfolioPlus S&P Small Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

• rltax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

RiverFront Asset Allocation Aggressive Class Investor

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »