GDGSX : Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund Class S

GDGSX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with HIGH fees.

GDGSX

Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund Class S

FI Score

22 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GDGSX vs PWRIX

16% FI Score
  • pwrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Power Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs CFRAX

16% FI Score
  • cfrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Floating Rate Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs MCLGX

16% FI Score
  • mclgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Mirae Asset Emerging Markets Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs PHECX

16% FI Score
  • phecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • International

PGIM Global Total Return (USD Hedged) Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs PUDBX

16% FI Score
  • pudbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

PGIM Real Assets Fund- Class B

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs CPAEX

16% FI Score
  • cpaex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs DAHYX

16% FI Score
  • dahyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Dunham High-Yield Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs DAREX

16% FI Score
  • darex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Dunham Real Estate Stock Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs DGRPX

16% FI Score
  • dgrpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Delaware Global Real Estate Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs UNWPX

16% FI Score
  • unwpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs EAIIX

16% FI Score
  • eaiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs ECTTX

16% FI Score
  • ecttx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Parametric TABS 10-to-20 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs QBDAX

16% FI Score
  • qbdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Quantified Managed Income Fund Advisor Class

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs RYEIX

15% FI Score
  • ryeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Rydex Energy Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs RYTAX

15% FI Score
  • rytax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Rydex Technology Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs DABAX

15% FI Score
  • dabax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Delaware Global Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs DAG

15% FI Score
  • dag
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

DB Agriculture Double Long ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs DGBP

15% FI Score
  • dgbp
  • ETF
  • Money Market
  • World

Citigroup ETNs linked to the VelocityShares Daily 4X Long USD vs. GBP Index

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs EFECX

15% FI Score
  • efecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs EIXAX

15% FI Score
  • eixax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo