Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$FLYCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 668 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- esg
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Impact Index Fund
Expenses: 0.32% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- lccax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- afnix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- mueax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- lmnvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
ClearBridge Value Trust Class I
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- sgiex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Class V
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- evsyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Wells Fargo Disciplined U.S. Core Fund - Class Admin
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- eivix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Wells Fargo Classic Value Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- wshcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »