Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
6 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$FBND Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,623 Bond Total US Bond Market funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- fldox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- aprix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Real Estate
AAM/Phocas Real Estate Fund Class I Shares
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »
- flrux
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Meeder Conservative Allocation Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- fldgx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ggrcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- fppax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Prudent Investor Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- dptax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
BNY Mellon Tax Managed Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- batt
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Basic Materials
Amplify Advanced Battery Metals and Materials ETF
Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »
- ehgax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Hexavest Global Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »