Diversification Rating
6 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
6 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
4 /10
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
USA Mutuals Vitium Global Fund Investor Class Shares
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Wasatch Global Opportunities Fund® Investor Class
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Brandes Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Centerstone Investors Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Lazard Global Dynamic Multi-Asset Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
RiverFront Asset Allocation Growth & Income Class C
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Transamerica Global Equity Class A
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Nuveen NWQ Global Equity Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
The Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map