Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$EKJYX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- nfecx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opportunity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- aqlgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Alta Quality Growth Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- dpuax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
BNY Mellon U.S. Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ryatx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Rydex NASDAQ-100® Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- spfax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth Fund-Class A
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- wvalx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Weitz Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- wpasx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AB Concentrated Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tadcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Transamerica US Growth Class C
Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- lcisx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »