ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs MCLAX

11% FI Score
  • mclax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Mirae Asset Asia Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HANCX

11% FI Score
  • hancx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hanlon Managed Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PSECX

11% FI Score
  • psecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

1789 Growth and Income Fund Class Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs APIFX

11% FI Score
  • apifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Yorktown Master Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RYIYX

11% FI Score
  • ryiyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse High Yield Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TRIFX

11% FI Score
  • trifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TPDCX

11% FI Score
  • tpdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RYMKX

11% FI Score
  • rymkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JSVCX

11% FI Score
  • jsvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

James Alpha Structured Credit Value Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 2.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NUBAX

11% FI Score
  • nubax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Unconstrained Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs OGYNX

11% FI Score
  • ogynx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco High Yield Bond Factor Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PCWCX

11% FI Score
  • pcwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Corporate Bond Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs STK

11% FI Score
  • stk
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TGIAX

11% FI Score
  • tgiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Timothy Plan Growth & Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TFLCX

11% FI Score
  • tflcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Transamerica Floating Rate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TMACX

11% FI Score
  • tmacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Touchstone Credit Opportunities II Fund C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs OSFAX

11% FI Score
  • osfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Plus Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ACEMX

11% FI Score
  • acemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Alger Emerging Markets Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ACHCX

11% FI Score
  • achcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Beacon Crescent Short Duration High Income Fund C Class

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ARYTX

11% FI Score
  • arytx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

American Century Global Real Estate Fund C Class

Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo