ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs IFV

32% FI Score
  • ifv
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NDCCX

32% FI Score
  • ndccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Nationwide Investor Destinations Conservative Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MSMLX

32% FI Score
  • msmlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Matthews Asia Small Companies Fund Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs LSQAX

32% FI Score
  • lsqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Invesco Long/Short Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FTNYX

32% FI Score
  • ftnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Delaware Tax-Free New York Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NVMBX

32% FI Score
  • nvmbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs SHYOX

32% FI Score
  • shyox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Western Asset Global High Yield Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs SIFAX

32% FI Score
  • sifax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund Class F

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PABCX

32% FI Score
  • pabcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

PGIM Balanced Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TPAY

32% FI Score
  • tpay
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Tortoise Digital Payments Infrastructure Fund

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs SSGMX

32% FI Score
  • ssgmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

State Street Defensive Global Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs STLAX

32% FI Score
  • stlax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic Retirement Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PFUMX

32% FI Score
  • pfumx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Principal Finisterre Unconstrained Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs DFVS

32% FI Score
  • dfvs
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

iPath US Treasury 5-year Bear ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs EGRCX

32% FI Score
  • egrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PHICX

32% FI Score
  • phicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

PGIM Muni High Income Fund-Class C

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MWFRX

32% FI Score
  • mwfrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Metropolitan West Floating Rate Income Fund Class M

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PLUSX

32% FI Score
  • plusx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund - Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PKRAX

32% FI Score
  • pkrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Peak Retirement 2065 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs DTUS

31% FI Score
  • dtus
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

iPath US Treasury 2-year Bear ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo