Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$ECASX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- etahx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- mbcax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
MFS California Municipal Bond Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ityax
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Invesco Technology Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- mllbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
MFS Lifetime Income Fund Class B
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- mllcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
MFS Lifetime Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- mltcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund Class C
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- tlesx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
AMG GW&K Emerging Markets Equity Fund - Class I
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- rreix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Real Estate
REMS Real Estate Income 50/50 Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »
- iemhx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- jiucx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
JPMorgan International Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- mwocx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Global Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- kctcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
DWS California Tax-Free Income Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nstix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Short Term Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hwaax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- icdax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Ivy Pzena International Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- ichkx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- China Stock
Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund
Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
- niicx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Conservative Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- savax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Virtus Newfleet Core Plus Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »