ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs EEMCX

34% FI Score
  • eemcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Columbia Emerging Markets Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NAVIX

34% FI Score
  • navix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Navigator Equity Hedged Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NAWSX

34% FI Score
  • nawsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs THYIX

34% FI Score
  • thyix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Transamerica High Yield Muni Class I

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NELAX

34% FI Score
  • nelax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Nuveen Equity Long/Short Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HDAVX

34% FI Score
  • hdavx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Janus Henderson Dividend & Income Builder Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TECS

33% FI Score
  • tecs
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X Shares

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TEQCX

33% FI Score
  • teqcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Touchstone Global ESG Equity Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TFIV

33% FI Score
  • tfiv
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Global X TargetIncome 5 ETF

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs THPBX

33% FI Score
  • thpbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

BNY Mellon Balanced Opportunity Fund - Class J

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs THIDX

33% FI Score
  • thidx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Toews Tactical Oceana Fund

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TIGCX

33% FI Score
  • tigcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Thornburg International Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TRGRX

33% FI Score
  • trgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

T. Rowe Price Global Real Estate Fund

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs UCMCX

33% FI Score
  • ucmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

USAA Cornerstone Moderately Conservative Fund

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs UNYBX

33% FI Score
  • unybx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

USAA New York Bond Fund Adviser Shares

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs UPW

33% FI Score
  • upw
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares Ultra Utilities

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs USGCX

33% FI Score
  • usgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Morgan Stanley U.S. Government Securities Trust Class L

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs USPIX

33% FI Score
  • uspix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

ProFunds UltraShort NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs UXI

33% FI Score
  • uxi
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares Ultra Industrials

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs VILLX

33% FI Score
  • villx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Villere Balanced Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo