ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs MRGR

34% FI Score
  • mrgr
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

ProShares Merger ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PRQAX

34% FI Score
  • prqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ACOAX

34% FI Score
  • acoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MRKAX

34% FI Score
  • mrkax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

AB All Market Income Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs QMHNX

34% FI Score
  • qmhnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RSSCX

34% FI Score
  • rsscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Columbia Global Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FNCAX

34% FI Score
  • fncax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Franklin NextStep Conservative Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs IARCX

34% FI Score
  • iarcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Invesco Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MXFAX

34% FI Score
  • mxfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MainStay Floating Rate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NBQAX

34% FI Score
  • nbqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Nuveen International Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NCINX

34% FI Score
  • ncinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nicholas High Income Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs IEYAX

34% FI Score
  • ieyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Ivy Energy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MSIPX

34% FI Score
  • msipx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Morgan Stanley Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MSNYX

34% FI Score
  • msnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS New York Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FTXG

34% FI Score
  • ftxg
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Defensive

First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MTKKX

34% FI Score
  • mtkkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2060 Series Class K

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GHAYX

34% FI Score
  • ghayx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

VanEck Global Hard Assets Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PBS

34% FI Score
  • pbs
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Invesco Dynamic Media ETF

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GIOCX

34% FI Score
  • giocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Guggenheim Macro Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PIGSX

34% FI Score
  • pigsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

BlackRock U.S. Government Bond Portfolio Service Shares

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo