ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs ACASX

34% FI Score
  • acasx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Access Capital Community Investment Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AFRCX

34% FI Score
  • afrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Floating Rate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AIRR

34% FI Score
  • airr
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

First Trust RBA American Industrial RenaissanceTM ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs APIUX

34% FI Score
  • apiux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Yorktown Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ARLCX

34% FI Score
  • arlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2035 Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ASICX

34% FI Score
  • asicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Invesco Asia Pacific Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AWSCX

34% FI Score
  • awscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Core Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AXEAX

34% FI Score
  • axeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Columbia Contrarian Europe Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AZMAX

34% FI Score
  • azmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AllianzGI Emerging Markets Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BCSAX

34% FI Score
  • bcsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BEARX

34% FI Score
  • bearx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Federated Prudent Bear Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 2.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BGSCX

34% FI Score
  • bgscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BISAX

34% FI Score
  • bisax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BLRCX

34% FI Score
  • blrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PFI

34% FI Score
  • pfi
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Invesco DWA Financial Momentum ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RBGCX

34% FI Score
  • rbgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Columbia Capital Allocation Aggressive Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CDICX

34% FI Score
  • cdicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CFICX

34% FI Score
  • cficx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Calvert Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CHIH

34% FI Score
  • chih
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Global X MSCI China Health Care ETF

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PPUCX

34% FI Score
  • ppucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (Unhedged) Class C

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo