ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs WFQVX

34% FI Score
  • wfqvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Wells Fargo Target 2045 Fund - Class A

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs WTMVX

34% FI Score
  • wtmvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Segall Bryant & Hamill Global Large Cap Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs YCS

34% FI Score
  • ycs
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Yen

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JEMDX

34% FI Score
  • jemdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BRPIX

34% FI Score
  • brpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

ProFunds Bear Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JJT

34% FI Score
  • jjt
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Tin Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NSBTX

34% FI Score
  • nsbtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Short Duration Bond Fund Trust Class

Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NVGBX

34% FI Score
  • nvgbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs OBCHX

34% FI Score
  • obchx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Oberweis China Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs OKMIX

34% FI Score
  • okmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Oklahoma Municipal Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JUCIX

34% FI Score
  • jucix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Janus Henderson Absolute Return Income Opportunities Fund - I Shares

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PBNAX

34% FI Score
  • pbnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments Class A

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NAEFX

34% FI Score
  • naefx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

New Alternatives Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NCHCX

34% FI Score
  • nchcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class C2

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MHIBX

34% FI Score
  • mhibx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MFS High Income Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MHICX

34% FI Score
  • mhicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MFS High Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PCRCX

34% FI Score
  • pcrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

PIMCO CommodityRealReturn Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AAAPX

34% FI Score
  • aaapx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AACFX

34% FI Score
  • aacfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Invesco Greater China Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AAZAX

34% FI Score
  • aazax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Municipal Income Fund II Arizona Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo