CHIR : Global X MSCI China Real Estate ETF

CHIR is a International Stocks Market China Stock with MODERATE fees.

CHIR

Global X MSCI China Real Estate ETF

FI Score

38 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CHIR vs RAAIX

23% FI Score
  • raaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Altegris/AACA Opportunistic Real Estate Fund I

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs FBPEX

23% FI Score
  • fbpex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

FBP Equity & Dividend Plus Fund

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs AMFZX

23% FI Score
  • amfzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

361 Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs KSMIX

23% FI Score
  • ksmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Keeley Small-Mid Cap Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs ESHAX

22% FI Score
  • eshax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Short Duration High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs MVEBX

22% FI Score
  • mvebx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Meritage Value Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs EPGFX

22% FI Score
  • epgfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

EuroPac Gold Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs DPTAX

22% FI Score
  • dptax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

BNY Mellon Tax Managed Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs CPATX

22% FI Score
  • cpatx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Counterpoint Tactical Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs CUHCX

22% FI Score
  • cuhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Victory US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd Index Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs EHGAX

22% FI Score
  • ehgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Hexavest Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs CVLCX

22% FI Score
  • cvlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Calamos Global Growth & Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs BATT

22% FI Score
  • batt
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Amplify Advanced Battery Metals and Materials ETF

Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs HCMAX

22% FI Score
  • hcmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Hillman Value Fund No Load Shares

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs FTTCX

22% FI Score
  • fttcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2025 Retirement Target Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs GDGSX

22% FI Score
  • gdgsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs NWJTX

22% FI Score
  • nwjtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nationwide Loomis Short Term Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs PHSCX

22% FI Score
  • phscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO High Yield Spectrum Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs BMPCX

22% FI Score
  • bmpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

BlackRock US Mortgage Portfolio Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIR vs MDGRX

22% FI Score
  • mdgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

BlackRock Natural Resources Trust Investor A Shares

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo