CHIC : Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

CHIC is a International Stocks Market China Stock with MODERATE fees.

CHIC

Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CHIC vs JNUG

47% FI Score
  • jnug
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X Shares

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs JXI

47% FI Score
  • jxi
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

iShares Global Utilities ETF

Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs LABU

47% FI Score
  • labu
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3X Shares

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs LAVLX

47% FI Score
  • lavlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs LGBCX

47% FI Score
  • lgbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs LKOR

47% FI Score
  • lkor
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

FlexShares Credit-Scored US Long Corporate Bond Index Fund

Expenses: 0.22% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs QVGIX

47% FI Score
  • qvgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs POEAX

47% FI Score
  • poeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PRFIX

47% FI Score
  • prfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Parnassus Fixed Income Fund

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PRROX

47% FI Score
  • prrox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady 2025 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs MCLOX

47% FI Score
  • mclox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BlackRock Global Allocation Fund, Inc. Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PLIAX

47% FI Score
  • pliax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Pacific Funds Core Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs TUNIX

47% FI Score
  • tunix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Transamerica Unconstrained Bond Class I

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs SBSTX

47% FI Score
  • sbstx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Western Asset Short-Term Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs RYPRX

47% FI Score
  • ryprx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Royce Premier Fund Investment Class

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs STDFX

47% FI Score
  • stdfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs VGFO

47% FI Score
  • vgfo
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Virtus WMC Global Factor Opportunities ETF

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs BWLIX

47% FI Score
  • bwlix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

American Beacon Bridgeway Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs USHYX

47% FI Score
  • ushyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

USAA High Income Fund

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs RWM

47% FI Score
  • rwm
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short Russell2000

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo